Fantasyscotus
WebPirani « Back to the case list Slack Technologies v. Pirani Want to make your own predictions? Join Now! Case Profile Question Presented Whether Sections 11 and 12 (a) (2) of the Securities Act of 1933 require plaintiffs to plead and prove that they bought shares registered under the registration statement they claim is misleading. Case Events WebFantasySCOTUS Cruz v. Arizona « Back to the case list Cruz v. Arizona Want to make your own predictions? Join Now! Case Profile Question Presented Whether the Arizona …
Fantasyscotus
Did you know?
WebFantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction Final SCOTUS Decision; 7 Reverse. 2 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. Live Justice Predictions - correct prediction - wrong prediction. Justice Fantasy SCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction
WebWhether various provisions of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 — namely, the minimum standards of Section 1912 (a), (d), (e), and (f); the placement-preference provisions of Section 1915 (a) and (b); and the recordkeeping provisions of Sections 1915 (e) and 1951 (a) — violate the anticommandeering doctrine of the 10th Amendment WebQuestion Presented Whether a “violation” under the Bank Secrecy Act is the failure to file an annual Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (no matter the number of foreign accounts), or whether there is a separate violation for each individual account that was not properly reported. Case Prediction Summary
WebFantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction Final SCOTUS Decision; 6 Reverse. 3 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. Live Justice … WebFantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction Final SCOTUS Decision; 9 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. Live Justice …
WebFantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction Final SCOTUS Decision; 0 Reverse. 9 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. Live Justice …
WebFantasySCOTUS FantasySCOTUS Sign Up.. Register a new account Already signed up? Click sign in to login your account. Get data from your social account * Password must contain 1 or more uppercase characters, 1 or more digits and must be 6 characters or more. I want to participate in the tournament to win cash prizes. Yes No two-headed bobtail lizardWebQuestion Presented Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit set forth the proper test for determining whether wetlands are "waters of the United States" under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1362 (7). Live Case Prediction - correct prediction- wrong prediction Live Justice Predictions - correct prediction- wrong prediction Case Events two-headed boyWebGarland « Back to the case list Pugin v. Garland Want to make your own predictions? Join Now! Case Profile Question Presented To qualify as “an offense relating to obstruction of justice,” 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (a) (43) (S), must a predicate offense require a nexus with a pending or ongoing investigation or judicial proceeding? Case Events Case Counsels two headed boyWebDocket Number: 22O145: Term: 2024: Full Name: Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin: Short Name: Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin: Petitioner: None: Respondent two headed bird symbolWebDocket Number: 21-707: Term: 2024: Full Name: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina: Short Name: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina two-headed boy lyricsWebDocket Number: 21-1168: Term: 2024: Full Name: Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Short Name: Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. Petitioner: None: Respondent two-headed boston terrierWebFantasySCOTUS Crowd Prediction {Marshall}+ Algorithmic Prediction Final SCOTUS Decision; 3 Reverse. 6 Affirm. 0 Reverse. 0 Affirm. 2 Reverse. 6 Affirm. Live Justice … talking to the future